Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

[Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:05:05 +0000
Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 December 2010 14:42, David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> wrote:
> > I'd even argue for a minimum *without attributes* and without mixed
> > content, no DTD subset, no namespaces, and only UTF8 support.
> 
> I've had to deal with "element only" xml and it's not that pleasant...
...

> 
> I agree with no DTDs, no namespaces, UTF-8 only etc... mixed content
> has to stay otherwise you may as well not call it xml.


I'd surmise this is for document Andrew?
What about machine produced XML?

Anyone else favour a no mixed content?
or is that a sub-sub set for the speed freaks?


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk