Re: [xml-dev] "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principle

[Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>]

XML 1.0/1.1 doesn't include schema does it?  So I don't see why MicroXML 
has to include schema in order to support schema-aware programs like 
JAXB.  One of the good things about schema (unlike DTD) is that it is 
layered *on top of* XML not intertwingled with it.

-Mike

On 07/16/2012 01:03 PM, David Lee wrote:
>    
>> Doesn't the JAXB model make sense here: push the typing inference to a
>> mapping process that has type awareness in the host language?  Different
>>      
> Yes, but then JAXB requires Schema.
> Do we pull Schema into MicroXML ?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> David A. Lee
> dlee@calldei.com
> http://www.xmlsh.org
>
>