| 00000 |
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-02 02:15 |
| 00001 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-02 08:43 |
| 00002 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-02 11:01 |
| 00003 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-02 12:37 |
| 00004 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-02 12:42 |
| 00005 |
One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-02 14:46 |
| 00006 |
Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-02 14:51 |
| 00007 |
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-02 15:44 |
| 00008 |
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions - Clarification |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-02 16:04 |
| 00009 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 16:28 |
| 00010 |
Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals" |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 16:28 |
| 00011 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-02 17:17 |
| 00012 |
OASIS-SC34 ODF Maintenance Feedback? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-02 17:56 |
| 00013 |
Re: [office] OASIS-SC34 ODF Maintenance Feedback? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 18:39 |
| 00014 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 11:38 |
| 00015 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 12:12 |
| 00016 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 12:49 |
| 00017 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions - Clarification |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 12:56 |
| 00018 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-03 13:03 |
| 00019 |
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 13:08 |
| 00020 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 13:43 |
| 00021 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 14:15 |
| 00022 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 14:34 |
| 00023 |
18.4 amin:audio-level |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 14:43 |
| 00024 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 14:49 |
| 00025 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 15:03 |
| 00026 |
[office] OpenDocument TC coordination call draft minutes 2009-02-02 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 15:28 |
| 00027 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 15:38 |
| 00028 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 16:05 |
| 00029 |
Moving forward on Conformance |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 16:05 |
| 00030 |
svg:ideographic? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 16:05 |
| 00031 |
Another next step |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-03 16:08 |
| 00032 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 16:10 |
| 00033 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-03 16:15 |
| 00034 |
Re: [office] Moving forward on Conformance |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-03 16:29 |
| 00035 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
"Dharles-I. Rchulz"
|
2009-02-03 17:00 |
| 00036 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 17:18 |
| 00037 |
Re: [office] Moving forward on Conformance |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 19:30 |
| 00038 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? - Raising the Floor, not the Ceiling? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-03 22:35 |
| 00039 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-03 23:23 |
| 00040 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-03 23:23 |
| 00041 |
RE: [office] Regarding Conformance Clauses |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 00:17 |
| 00042 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-04 00:49 |
| 00043 |
A few of specific examples |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-04 00:49 |
| 00044 |
RE: [office] Regarding Conformance Clauses |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 02:17 |
| 00045 |
Re: [office] A few of specific examples] |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-04 02:43 |
| 00046 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 04:46 |
| 00047 |
RE: [office] A few of specific examples |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 04:46 |
| 00048 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 05:51 |
| 00049 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 06:03 |
| 00050 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-04 11:11 |
| 00051 |
Nlnet Foundation to fund ODF projects |
Carol Geyer
|
2009-02-04 15:34 |
| 00052 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-04 19:25 |
| 00053 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 20:06 |
| 00054 |
Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-04 23:16 |
| 00055 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 23:36 |
| 00056 |
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-04 23:55 |
| 00057 |
RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 00:08 |
| 00058 |
Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-05 13:24 |
| 00059 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 20:14 |
| 00060 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-05 21:30 |
| 00061 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-05 21:47 |
| 00062 |
OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda January 9th, 2008 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-05 21:47 |
| 00063 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 22:07 |
| 00064 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-05 23:03 |
| 00065 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 23:10 |
| 00066 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 23:10 |
| 00067 |
RE: [office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda January 9th, 2008 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-05 23:14 |
| 00068 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-05 23:14 |
| 00069 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-05 23:51 |
| 00070 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 00:20 |
| 00071 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-06 01:22 |
| 00072 |
Re: ODF Conformance |
David Faure
|
2009-02-06 10:18 |
| 00073 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-06 12:03 |
| 00074 |
Re: [office] RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1? |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-06 16:41 |
| 00075 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 19:17 |
| 00076 |
RE: [office] RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-06 19:58 |
| 00077 |
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-06 22:35 |
| 00078 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-06 23:09 |
| 00079 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-07 00:15 |
| 00080 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-07 00:54 |
| 00081 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Andreas J Guelzow
|
2009-02-07 01:47 |
| 00082 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-07 01:47 |
| 00083 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Duane Nickull
|
2009-02-07 02:08 |
| 00084 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
"Eennis F. Iamilton"
|
2009-02-07 02:37 |
| 00085 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-07 13:39 |
| 00086 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
David A. Wheeler
|
2009-02-07 15:16 |
| 00087 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-07 16:10 |
| 00088 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-07 16:37 |
| 00089 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Duane Nickull
|
2009-02-07 16:50 |
| 00090 |
Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-07 18:14 |
| 00091 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-07 18:14 |
| 00092 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Andreas J Guelzow
|
2009-02-07 18:52 |
| 00093 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-08 01:10 |
| 00094 |
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-08 17:39 |
| 00095 |
Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-08 17:39 |
| 00096 |
RE: [office] Strict Conformance |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-08 20:03 |
| 00097 |
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-08 20:03 |
| 00098 |
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-08 21:55 |
| 00099 |
Res: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-09 00:19 |
| 00100 |
RE: [office] Moving forward on Conformance - OIC Role |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 04:23 |
| 00101 |
Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification Conformance Proflie? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 04:23 |
| 00102 |
Re: [office] Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification ConformanceProflie? |
Duane Nickull
|
2009-02-09 04:39 |
| 00103 |
RE: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 06:20 |
| 00104 |
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 06:20 |
| 00105 |
RE: [office] Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification Conformance Proflie? |
"Eennis F. Iamilton"
|
2009-02-09 06:34 |
| 00106 |
Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications, Extension features |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 09:33 |
| 00107 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 09:41 |
| 00108 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 10:57 |
| 00109 |
Re: Res: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 11:00 |
| 00110 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 11:03 |
| 00111 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 11:09 |
| 00112 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 11:29 |
| 00113 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 11:46 |
| 00114 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 11:54 |
| 00115 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 12:07 |
| 00116 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 12:18 |
| 00117 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 12:22 |
| 00118 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 12:38 |
| 00119 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 13:17 |
| 00120 |
Re: [office] Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals" |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-09 13:40 |
| 00121 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 13:41 |
| 00122 |
Re: [office] Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals" |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-09 13:52 |
| 00123 |
OpenDocument TC meeting minutes 2009-02-09 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 16:53 |
| 00124 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 17:01 |
| 00125 |
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8 |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 17:01 |
| 00126 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications, Extension features |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-09 17:24 |
| 00127 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-09 18:24 |
| 00128 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 18:56 |
| 00129 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
David Faure
|
2009-02-09 19:15 |
| 00130 |
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-09 19:32 |
| 00131 |
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-09 20:33 |
| 00132 |
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
Shomas Yander
|
2009-02-10 09:46 |
| 00133 |
Groups - Conformance Definition Proposal (08-09-26-proposal00074) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 15:48 |
| 00135 |
Groups - Conformance Definition Proposal (conformance-definition-proposal-v9.odt) (formerly 08-09-26-proposal00074) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 15:49 |
| 00134 |
OpenDocument conformance definition proposal v9 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-10 15:57 |
| 00136 |
Struggling 150 years for Standards |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-10 20:54 |
| 00137 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications,Extension features |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-11 08:16 |
| 00138 |
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-draft8j.odt (OpenDocument-v1.2-draft8j.odt) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 18:08 |
| 00139 |
The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 20:37 |
| 00140 |
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 20:37 |
| 00141 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-11 22:09 |
| 00142 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Shomas Yander
|
2009-02-12 10:20 |
| 00143 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 10:48 |
| 00144 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 11:04 |
| 00145 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Shomas Yander
|
2009-02-12 11:51 |
| 00146 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-12 12:24 |
| 00147 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 13:22 |
| 00148 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 13:30 |
| 00149 |
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-draft9.odt uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 13:40 |
| 00150 |
OpenDocument v1.2 Draft 9 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-12 13:48 |
| 00151 |
Groups - OpenDocument-schema-v1.2-draft9.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 14:17 |
| 00152 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Shomas Yander
|
2009-02-12 14:24 |
| 00153 |
Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-12 14:47 |
| 00154 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-12 14:58 |
| 00155 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-12 15:20 |
| 00156 |
[office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda February 16th, 2009 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-12 15:30 |
| 00157 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 16:00 |
| 00158 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-12 16:12 |
| 00159 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Shomas Yander
|
2009-02-12 16:32 |
| 00160 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 16:37 |
| 00161 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 16:37 |
| 00162 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 16:59 |
| 00163 |
Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
David Faure
|
2009-02-12 17:12 |
| 00164 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-12 19:12 |
| 00165 |
Part 2? |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-12 21:27 |
| 00166 |
Re: [office] Part 2? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 22:32 |
| 00167 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 22:32 |
| 00168 |
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-13 08:17 |
| 00169 |
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-13 10:06 |
| 00170 |
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Andreas J. Guelzow
|
2009-02-13 14:52 |
| 00171 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-13 15:07 |
| 00172 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-13 15:11 |
| 00173 |
RDF metadata as an extension mechanism |
Michael Stahl
|
2009-02-13 15:18 |
| 00174 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-13 15:57 |
| 00175 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-13 16:06 |
| 00176 |
Re: [office] RDF metadata as an extension mechanism |
Jirka Kosek
|
2009-02-13 16:12 |
| 00177 |
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power and Legacy Obligations |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-13 19:56 |
| 00178 |
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-13 21:49 |
| 00179 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power and Legacy Obligations |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-14 08:17 |
| 00180 |
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Thorsten Zachmann
|
2009-02-15 12:21 |
| 00181 |
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-15 13:00 |
| 00182 |
Groups - ODF Register of Public Comments (07-11-24-spec00025) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-15 21:56 |
| 00183 |
Groups - ODF Register of Public Comments (CommentsRegistry.ods) (formerly 07-11-24-spec00025) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-15 21:57 |
| 00184 |
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-15 22:48 |
| 00185 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-16 06:09 |
| 00186 |
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Thorsten Zachmann
|
2009-02-16 14:44 |
| 00187 |
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-16 14:49 |
| 00188 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-16 15:47 |
| 00189 |
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-16 15:53 |
| 00190 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-16 17:17 |
| 00191 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Bob Jolliffe
|
2009-02-16 21:52 |
| 00192 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-17 14:18 |
| 00193 |
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 (OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01.odt) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-17 15:05 |
| 00194 |
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-17 16:39 |
| 00195 |
Color/Intensity issue |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-17 17:44 |
| 00196 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-18 11:06 |
| 00197 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-18 14:55 |
| 00198 |
minutes for Feb 16 meeting? |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-18 16:07 |
| 00199 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-18 17:00 |
| 00200 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-18 17:36 |
| 00201 |
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power |
Thomas Zander
|
2009-02-18 19:46 |
| 00202 |
[office] OpenDocument TC coordination call draft minutes 2009-02-16 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-19 10:32 |
| 00203 |
OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda February 23rd, 2008 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-19 20:20 |
| 00204 |
Groups - references.odt uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-20 00:01 |
| 00205 |
ODF 1.2 References |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-20 01:04 |
| 00206 |
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 References |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-20 01:17 |
| 00207 |
ISO/IEC 26300 maintenance protocols |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-20 16:31 |
| 00208 |
Unanimous Consent |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-20 20:42 |
| 00209 |
ODF-Next Call for Proposals |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-21 00:54 |
| 00210 |
RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF all versions) |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-21 23:24 |
| 00211 |
RE: [office] RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF all versions) |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-22 02:01 |
| 00212 |
Re: [office] RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF allversions) |
Duane Nickull
|
2009-02-22 03:37 |
| 00213 |
RELAX NG and xml:id |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-22 20:31 |
| 00214 |
Re: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-22 21:48 |
| 00215 |
RE: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-23 02:43 |
| 00216 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-23 02:43 |
| 00217 |
Re: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-23 08:18 |
| 00218 |
Re: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-23 08:21 |
| 00219 |
Re: [office-comment] Whitespace again (ODF all version) |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-23 13:17 |
| 00220 |
Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-23 13:40 |
| 00221 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2 |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-23 14:11 |
| 00222 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2 |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-23 14:27 |
| 00223 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2 |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-23 15:34 |
| 00224 |
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2 |
Patrick Durusau
|
2009-02-23 15:44 |
| 00225 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-23 17:49 |
| 00226 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-23 18:11 |
| 00227 |
OpenDocument TC meeting minutes 2009-02-23 |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 20:39 |
| 00228 |
TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 22:19 |
| 00229 |
Res: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-24 22:38 |
| 00230 |
Res: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-24 22:38 |
| 00231 |
RE: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Timetransition |
Stephen Peront
|
2009-02-24 22:39 |
| 00232 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 --Schemas? |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-25 20:52 |
| 00233 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-25 21:23 |
| 00234 |
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-25 21:42 |
| 00235 |
Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Stephen Peront
|
2009-02-26 15:46 |
| 00236 |
[office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda March 2nd, 2008 |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-26 16:04 |
| 00237 |
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 17:00 |
| 00238 |
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-26 17:10 |
| 00239 |
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-26 17:34 |
| 00240 |
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 17:56 |
| 00241 |
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-26 18:13 |
| 00242 |
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-26 18:28 |
| 00243 |
Res: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Jomar Silva
|
2009-02-26 18:42 |
| 00244 |
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 19:24 |
| 00245 |
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 19:24 |
| 00246 |
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Stephen Peront
|
2009-02-26 22:10 |
| 00247 |
Re: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Cob Kolliffe
|
2009-02-26 23:34 |
| 00248 |
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Doug Mahugh
|
2009-02-27 02:56 |
| 00249 |
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-27 10:45 |
| 00250 |
A question about text:span and styles |
David Faure
|
2009-02-27 13:49 |
| 00251 |
Re: [office] A question about text:span and styles |
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
|
2009-02-27 14:27 |
| 00252 |
Re: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Warren Turkal
|
2009-02-27 16:47 |
| 00253 |
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Stephen Peront
|
2009-02-27 19:12 |
| 00254 |
RE: [office] A question about text:span and styles |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-27 21:17 |
| 00255 |
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal |
Dennis E. Hamilton
|
2009-02-27 21:18 |
| 00256 |
Another view on conformance? |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-28 07:59 |
| 00257 |
Re: [office] Another view on conformance? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-28 15:25 |
| 00258 |
Re: [office] Another view on conformance? |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-28 15:35 |
| 00259 |
Re: [office] Another view on conformance? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-28 16:14 |
| 00260 |
Re: [office] Another view on conformance? |
Dave Pawson
|
2009-02-28 17:00 |
| 00261 |
Re: [office] Another view on conformance? |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-28 21:31 |
