[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: experts
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:59:28 -0800
At 07:40 PM 27/03/01 -0800, Dave Winer wrote:
>Simon's argument, and mine, are consistent with your definition. We have
>plenty of people with a high degree of knowledge of a certain subject. What
>we need more of are people who actually do the work. You know, the people in
>the trenches. Dave
Hmm, if you look at the original XML working group (from memory, sorry)
Bosak: made his pre-XML name building good big techdoc web sites
Bray: Codes occasionally, talks incessantly
Clark: Well, yes
Connolly: Technical guy compromised by process expertise
DeRose: Heavily published in every CompSci journal worth mentioning, and
one of very few human beings to have made money with SGML
Hollander: Publishing heavy, did hp.com in his spare time
Kimber: Implemented much of HyTime in VB
Maler: Arguably world's leading DTD expert
Murata: Understands hedge automata and modal verbs
Paoli: Editing-centric SGML hack
Sperberg-McQueen: Theory-heavy, publishing-centric
Sharpe: Wrote Author/Editor and *MetaL descendents
I guess this supports Dave's point. -Tim