[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
- From: Ann Navarro <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Rick Jelliffe <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:30:04 -0400
At 04:17 PM 7/23/2001 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: "Ann Navarro" <email@example.com>
> > Why wouldn't it be ok?
>I don't believe that allowing blueberry label only when
>blueberry capabilities are used is practical.
>That is why I think forget a new version and just make it
>a fix for the new edition, pre-announced.
I don't think it really matters if it's a new version or an errata fix.
Countless other specs and technologies have dealt with versioning issues --
XML isn't unique, and it won't break the world if it changes any more than
any other version broke any other world.
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/