[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
- From: Bob Hutchison <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:23:25 -0500
On 01/10/30 7:18 AM, "Don Park" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> An alternative would be to have an attribute that declares the
>> name of the attribute that is an ID attribute, say xml:idatt.
> Aye. One more vote for xml:idatt. I prefer its value to be a list of zero
> or more XML names. Nested xml:idatt should override inherited list
> One serious problem is the namespace issue which is further complicated when
> dealing with a list of attribute names belonging to multiple namespaces.
I agree that xml:idatt is the best idea so far. However, I would prefer this
to be defined on a namespace basis. Something like ns:xml:idatt -- just like
regular attributes (an xml:idatt would apply to the unspecified namespace
namespace or whatever it is called and is would be equivalent to the
original proposal I think).
If this was the rule, then any attribute named would necessarily be in the
same (attribute) namespace. Adding/removing of attributes becomes localised
to a namespace, nobody has to know about anything other than their own
namespace. I'm a little concerned with the list manipulation requirements
being place on tools that generate XML -- the contents of an xml:idatt seems
to be seriously dependent on the document in question, the tools (and
humans) will have to consider attributes designated by other namespaces.
(Obviously I think the idatts in practice will be associated with
> Don Park