xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization

Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Subject: Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:52:39 -0800
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <1015032338.3309.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <p04330103b8a7fd271d04@[192.168.254.4]> <1015178176.5268.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <p04330104b8a8106aa395@[192.168.254.4]> <1015193078.3350.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> <p04330107b8a85bc15730@[192.168.254.4]> <1015201142.3309.108.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011221

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Then that leaves me wondering yet again whether XInclude is as good an
> idea as its promoters seems to believe.  

Despite the fact that XInclude seems like an obviously-good idea, I
do not observe a rush of implementations nor people complaining about
the recommendation not being done.  I'm not sure, to be honest, if
the world really eneds it.  I don't for any of my work.  -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>

References:
- canonicalization
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] canonicalization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread