[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 13:47, Tim Bray wrote:
> That's precisely what I'm disagreeing with... I'm becoming
> more & more convinced that inclusion and aggregation have so
> much application-specific hair, and the cost of trying to
> model them generally is so high, that we should just kick
> them out of the syntax and at the level of *interoperability*,
> we should talk in terms of whole fully composed XML documents.
"Fully composed XML documents" is a really nice way to put it. It seems
by far the lowest-cost approach to interoperability.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
