[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Tim Bray wrote:
> Interesting bet; I'll take it. All we need is a document-embeddable,
> idempotency-assumable form blessed officially and we're off to the
> races.
I was assuming that we wouldn't have such a thing, but if we have and
you win because it's solved the problem I'll probably be handing out
cigars as well as booze!
> I'm after the low-hanging fruit. If the GET mapping turns
> out to be popular, maybe somebody real smart will figure out a good
> way to to encode your blocks in a URL.
And I'll be laughing all the way to the wine shop :)
Francis.
|
