[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
By itself, RELAX NG in XML syntax is easy enough, even without a tool. The
compact non-XML syntax makes it even easier.
On the other hand, XML Schema is already made somewhat easier by the tools
that have adopted it. I only know of one tool so far that has adopted RELAX
NG (http://www.topologi.com), but RELAX NG is so easy to grasp, in my
opinion, that you don't need a tool to UNDERSTAND it, though it's handy to
have tools to manipulate it. XML Schema seems designed to force the use of
tools, given its complexity, which is a boon to those who produce
applications I guess.
As for me, when Trang [1] produces XML Schema output (hopefully soon), I
will just stick with RELAX NG's compact syntax to produce XML Schema results
as well. So why would XML Schema need a non-XML syntax? %^}
Mike
[1] http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean McGrath [mailto:sean.mcgrath@propylon.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
>
>
> "W3C Schema will soon disappear into oblivion without a non XML syntax..."
>
> - Tom Gaven, XML Journal. Vol 3, Issue 6, Page 48
>
> Opinions?
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
