xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)

Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:13:47 +0100
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030708171504.02495b78@serrano.hesketh.net>
References: <33856.65.121.82.178.1057698382.squirrel@caretaker.dyomedea .com><5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@serrano.hesketh.net><5.2.0.9.2.20030708100540.023f4640@serrano.hesketh.net><000b01c34555$a9074af0$6401a8c0@tbp1><Pine.LNX.4.44.0307082054410.16181-100000@lorien.yeslogic.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@serrano.hesketh.net>

At 17:18 08/07/2003 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:


>  I also find XSLT to have been a convenient excuse for certain vendors to 
> ignore improving the level of support of CSS in their browsers and in 
> their other tools.

I don't see the logic there Simon.
Would you expand please?

Regards DaveP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: Frank <frank@bunter.therichards.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Motivations for namespaces (sorry)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread