Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@sun.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:56:56 +0530

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@sun.com> wrote:
> The fact that DTDs were
> baked into XML 1.0 is a historical accident.

I think, this statement affirms my point to some extent :)


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

References:
- XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]