Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:49:06 -0800

On 2009-11-11, at 12:50 AM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:

> As suggested by Jim Tivy earlier, a generic phrase like "XML Schema"
> in the XML spec, while referring to XML validation would be helpful to
> readers, in the present context.

Absolutely not.  The various XML schema languages need well-formed  
XML. Well-formed XML exists independent of any schemas.  The fact that  
DTDs were baked into XML 1.0 is a historical accident.  -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Michael Ludwig <milu71@gmx.de>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>

References:
- XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
- Re: [xml-dev] XML spec and XSD
  - From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]