Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolu

[John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> wrote:

Whatever the merits of RDF, so-called RDF-XML was an utter and
complete crock, the slpadash result of happy-go-taggy weekenders
projecting their experience with tossing tags into Netscape and
Explorer.

I actually thought it was quite clever: it maximized the chances that

existing XML documents could be processed as RDF, though of

course not 100% of them.

Using it as the first and only syntax, of course, was — unfortunate.

--

GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures