192 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
| Thread Index
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Apr 2016 07:25:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From harvey <harvey@eccnet.com> on 30 Apr 2016 01:50:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Lauren Wood <lauren@textuality.com> on 29 Apr 2016 23:10:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs!
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 22:34:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs!
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 29 Apr 2016 20:55:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 29 Apr 2016 20:31:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition toparsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator?
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 29 Apr 2016 20:15:43 -0000
- Old tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 29 Apr 2016 20:04:19 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs!
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 29 Apr 2016 20:00:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs!
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 29 Apr 2016 19:28:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Use DTDs!
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 29 Apr 2016 18:12:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 17:44:25 -0000
- Use DTDs!
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Apr 2016 17:40:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 29 Apr 2016 17:30:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 16:58:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From "Norman Gray" <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Apr 2016 16:28:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Jim Tivy <jimt@bluestream.com> on 29 Apr 2016 15:41:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 15:30:20 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 29 Apr 2016 14:55:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 29 Apr 2016 14:06:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 29 Apr 2016 13:17:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From "Norman Gray" <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 29 Apr 2016 12:54:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] SGML default attributes.
- From harvey <harvey@eccnet.com> on 29 Apr 2016 11:42:38 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition toparsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Apr 2016 11:40:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Apr 2016 11:26:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition toparsing)? XML Parser = Parser + DTD Validator?
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 29 Apr 2016 11:21:20 -0000
- Does an XML parser do DTD validation (in addition to parsing)? XMLParser = Parser + DTD Validator?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Apr 2016 11:15:02 -0000
- SGML default attributes.
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 08:33:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Serhiy Hapiy <hapiy.serhiy@gmail.com> on 29 Apr 2016 05:36:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 29 Apr 2016 03:20:26 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 29 Apr 2016 02:23:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 29 Apr 2016 02:16:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 28 Apr 2016 23:22:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From dal <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com> on 28 Apr 2016 20:23:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 28 Apr 2016 20:18:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 28 Apr 2016 20:02:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 28 Apr 2016 18:50:32 -0000
- Fw: new message
- From Stan Wakefield <awebber@wwwebbers.com> on 28 Apr 2016 18:01:03 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 28 Apr 2016 17:50:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net> on 28 Apr 2016 14:13:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From "sean.mcgrath@propylon.com" <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 28 Apr 2016 09:15:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 28 Apr 2016 06:42:36 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML to troff still at work
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 27 Apr 2016 20:05:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XML to troff still at work
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 27 Apr 2016 19:00:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 25 Apr 2016 21:35:09 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 25 Apr 2016 18:18:14 -0000
- XML to troff still at work
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 25 Apr 2016 16:03:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 25 Apr 2016 15:56:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 25 Apr 2016 15:21:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 25 Apr 2016 14:36:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 25 Apr 2016 13:49:06 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing,hierarchical data serialization format
- From "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch> on 25 Apr 2016 08:59:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchicaldata serialization format
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 25 Apr 2016 08:39:41 -0000
- Decisions and making flexible systems
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 24 Apr 2016 10:47:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 24 Apr 2016 02:31:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 24 Apr 2016 02:24:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From James Bryce Clark OASIS <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> on 23 Apr 2016 16:55:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 23 Apr 2016 15:47:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Apr 2016 14:18:27 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 23 Apr 2016 13:34:23 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 23 Apr 2016 06:45:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 23 Apr 2016 06:17:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 23 Apr 2016 05:43:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 23 Apr 2016 05:39:53 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 23 Apr 2016 04:53:48 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchicaldata serialization format
- From Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 22 Apr 2016 16:52:08 -0000
- yet another richly-typed, self-describing, hierarchical dataserialization format
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 22 Apr 2016 16:21:37 -0000
- [ANN] Release of XMLmind XSL-FO Converter v5.4.1
- From Hussein Shafie <hussein@xmlmind.com> on 22 Apr 2016 15:36:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 22 Apr 2016 12:46:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 22 Apr 2016 12:33:19 -0000
- [ann] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7
- From <hussein.shafie@yahoo.com> on 22 Apr 2016 08:14:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 22 Apr 2016 08:13:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 22 Apr 2016 04:02:47 -0000
- [ann] oXygen XML Editor version 18 and new oXygen XML Web Authorproduct
- From George Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 21 Apr 2016 19:11:30 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 21 Apr 2016 03:32:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 21 Apr 2016 01:31:15 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 20 Apr 2016 22:09:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 20 Apr 2016 21:52:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying datamodel
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2016 21:49:11 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying datamodel
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2016 21:33:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2016 21:23:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 20 Apr 2016 21:06:52 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] A question of necessity
- From Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com> on 20 Apr 2016 03:37:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] 3B2 markup/typesetting codes
- From Gareth Oakes <goakes@gpsl.co> on 20 Apr 2016 02:55:01 -0000
- A question of necessity
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 20 Apr 2016 02:13:51 -0000
- 3B2 markup/typesetting codes
- From "sean.mcgrath@propylon.com" <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com> on 19 Apr 2016 15:16:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Transforming documents with undefined entities
- From Andrew Campbell <Andrew.Campbell@synchronoss.com> on 19 Apr 2016 13:50:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Transforming documents with undefined entities
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 19 Apr 2016 12:43:43 -0000
- Transforming documents with undefined entities
- From Andrew Campbell <Andrew.Campbell@synchronoss.com> on 19 Apr 2016 08:27:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 18 Apr 2016 22:47:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N
- From Pedro Adame Vergara <pedro.a.1smr@gmail.com> on 18 Apr 2016 22:34:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Apr 2016 22:23:56 -0000
- XSD Validating unknown number of attributes from 1 to N
- From Pedro Adame Vergara <pedro.a.1smr@gmail.com> on 18 Apr 2016 16:17:48 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch> on 18 Apr 2016 14:59:41 -0000
- Fw: new message
- From Gerald Trites <awebber@wwwebbers.com> on 18 Apr 2016 14:12:06 -0000
- Fw: new message
- From Activities <awebber@wwwebbers.com> on 18 Apr 2016 13:49:44 -0000
- Fw: new message
- From Bobby <awebber@wwwebbers.com> on 18 Apr 2016 13:49:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Apr 2016 12:24:52 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying datamodel
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 18 Apr 2016 11:32:38 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 18 Apr 2016 11:05:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Norman Gray" <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> on 18 Apr 2016 10:28:07 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 18 Apr 2016 09:18:13 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 18 Apr 2016 08:58:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 18 Apr 2016 08:23:46 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch> on 18 Apr 2016 01:01:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> on 17 Apr 2016 23:59:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 17 Apr 2016 20:27:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 17 Apr 2016 19:47:45 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch> on 17 Apr 2016 19:10:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 17 Apr 2016 19:10:22 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org> on 17 Apr 2016 18:38:12 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 17 Apr 2016 18:36:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Lauren Wood <lauren@textuality.com> on 17 Apr 2016 18:29:17 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Apr 2016 17:58:13 -0000
- Re: Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From ht@markup.co.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 17 Apr 2016 17:42:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 17 Apr 2016 17:27:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> on 17 Apr 2016 12:31:16 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Apr 2016 11:58:50 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 17 Apr 2016 09:35:54 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Apr 2016 05:01:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred overdynamic resolution of names
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Apr 2016 04:24:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 17 Apr 2016 01:55:08 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 16 Apr 2016 22:56:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 16 Apr 2016 22:41:21 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Apr 2016 22:30:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 16 Apr 2016 22:21:59 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 16 Apr 2016 22:02:37 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Jim Tivy <jimt@bluestream.com> on 16 Apr 2016 21:18:19 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 16 Apr 2016 21:00:43 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 16 Apr 2016 19:54:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Before creating a syntax, create an underlying datamodel
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Apr 2016 19:10:31 -0000
- Before creating a syntax, create an underlying data model
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Apr 2016 19:08:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 16 Apr 2016 18:53:02 -0000
- RE: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Apr 2016 17:09:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Apr 2016 17:01:06 -0000
- Does the XML syntax have an underlying data model?
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 16 Apr 2016 16:11:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net> on 16 Apr 2016 15:32:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 16 Apr 2016 14:00:25 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net> on 16 Apr 2016 01:47:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] RE: Static resolution of names is preferred overdynamic resolution of names
- From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 15 Apr 2016 14:12:06 -0000
- RE: Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolutionof names
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Apr 2016 14:04:11 -0000
- =?UTF-8?Q?XSLT_=2F_XPath_=2F_XML_Training_Courses_on_Pluralsight_?==?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=93_6_months_FREE_subscription?=
- From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 15 Apr 2016 04:41:15 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 15 Apr 2016 04:38:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Apr 2016 16:00:57 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 14 Apr 2016 14:00:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@gmail.com> on 14 Apr 2016 13:41:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 14 Apr 2016 11:38:02 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 14 Apr 2016 11:28:41 -0000
- [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7
- From <hussein.shafie@yahoo.com> on 14 Apr 2016 08:34:22 -0000
- Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution ofnames
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 13 Apr 2016 11:58:55 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Apr 2016 11:07:41 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 13 Apr 2016 08:34:44 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From "HILLMAN, Tomos" <tomos.hillman@oup.com> on 13 Apr 2016 07:53:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Apr 2016 06:18:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespacespecified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via anENTITY
- From Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> on 12 Apr 2016 21:00:14 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Apr 2016 18:14:32 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Apr 2016 17:09:39 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 12 Apr 2016 16:58:31 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From - - <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 12 Apr 2016 15:36:21 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 12 Apr 2016 08:41:18 -0000
- [ANN] Release of XMLmind XML Editor v6.7
- From <hussein.shafie@yahoo.com> on 12 Apr 2016 08:14:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 12 Apr 2016 07:56:42 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently withwhitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespacespecified via an ENTITY
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 11 Apr 2016 22:33:04 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 11 Apr 2016 18:53:29 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Dan Sullivan <dsullivan@danal.com> on 11 Apr 2016 18:26:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 11 Apr 2016 18:21:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com> on 11 Apr 2016 17:26:24 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Benito van der Zander <benito@benibela.de> on 11 Apr 2016 12:59:35 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 11 Apr 2016 12:48:46 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Ghislain Fourny <g@28.io> on 11 Apr 2016 07:41:49 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 11 Apr 2016 07:25:58 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 11 Apr 2016 07:09:56 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 11 Apr 2016 05:36:51 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> on 11 Apr 2016 04:09:33 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 10 Apr 2016 21:20:28 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> on 10 Apr 2016 20:01:18 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 10 Apr 2016 19:42:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] YPath, ZPath?
- From "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org> on 10 Apr 2016 19:05:11 -0000
- YPath, ZPath?
- From Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@yahoo.de> on 10 Apr 2016 18:47:06 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespacespecified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY
- From David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle@gmail.com> on 8 Apr 2016 18:34:45 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 8 Apr 2016 14:16:10 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 8 Apr 2016 14:00:40 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespacespecified directly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via anENTITY
- From Christophe Marchand <cmarchand@oxiane.com> on 8 Apr 2016 12:31:50 -0000
- Caution! XML parsers behave differently with whitespace specifieddirectly in attribute value versus whitespace specified via an ENTITY
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Apr 2016 11:49:44 -0000
- Fw: new message
- From Bobby <awebber@wwwebbers.com> on 6 Apr 2016 18:19:07 -0000
- Standing on the shoulders of giants
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 6 Apr 2016 12:08:17 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] =?UTF-8?B?SGVyZcKScyBob3cgdGhlIFNjaGVtYXRyb24gICBw?==?UTF-8?B?cm9ncmFtICBnZW5lcmF0ZXMgcHJvZ3JhbXMgICAgcHJvZ3JhbSBnZW5lcmF0aW4=?==?UTF-8?B?ZyAgIHByb2dyYW1z?=
- From Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net> on 5 Apr 2016 20:38:17 -0000
- =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bxml=2Ddev=5D_Here=E2=80=99s_how_the_Schematron_program_ge?==?UTF-8?Q?nerates_programs_program_generating_programs?=
- From David Carlisle <d.p.carlisle@gmail.com> on 5 Apr 2016 15:43:13 -0000
- =?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bxml-dev=5D_Here=C2=92s_how_the_Schematron___p?==?utf-8?Q?rogram__generates_programs____program_generating___pro?==?utf-8?Q?grams?=
- From Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Apr 2016 14:23:34 -0000
- Re: [xml-dev] Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs … program generating programs
- From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 5 Apr 2016 13:14:33 -0000
- Here’s how the Schematron program generates programs … program generating programs
- From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 5 Apr 2016 12:54:09 -0000
- Returned mail: see transcript for details
- From liam@w3.org on 5 Apr 2016 03:39:34 -0000
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.14
