OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolution of names

Hi guys,

Is this the twilight zone?

Did I step accidentally into a black hole?

At best we are not leaving on the same planet.

From: John Cowan [johnwcowan@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 April 2016 01:59
To: Arjun Ray
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net<mailto:arjun.ray@verizon.net>> wrote:
Whatever the merits of RDF, so-called RDF-XML was an utter and
complete crock, the slpadash result of happy-go-taggy weekenders
projecting their experience with tossing tags into Netscape and

I actually thought it was quite clever: it maximized the chances that
existing XML documents could be processed as RDF, though of
course not 100% of them.

Using it as the first and only syntax, of course, was — unfortunate.

GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 1993-2007 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS