RE: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamicresolu

["Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>]

Hi guys,

Is this the twilight zone?

Did I step accidentally into a black hole?

At best we are not leaving on the same planet.

Jean-Pierre
________________________________
From: John Cowan [johnwcowan@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 April 2016 01:59
To: Arjun Ray
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Static resolution of names is preferred over dynamic resolution of names


On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@verizon.net<mailto:arjun.ray@verizon.net>> wrote:
Whatever the merits of RDF, so-called RDF-XML was an utter and
complete crock, the slpadash result of happy-go-taggy weekenders
projecting their experience with tossing tags into Netscape and
Explorer.

I actually thought it was quite clever: it maximized the chances that
existing XML documents could be processed as RDF, though of
course not 100% of them.

Using it as the first and only syntax, of course, was — unfortunate.

--
GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************