xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:45:19 -0700
Cc: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@develop.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CB5@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <006301c2109a$e68cf280$0300a8c0@skonnardomni> <20020610174934.GA12033@talsever.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529

Amelia A Lewis wrote:

> In XML, typing specifies validation algorithms.

Hmm... well it also allows software to unpack XML instances into native 
storage in a sensible way without being savvy to the internals of the 
applications that generated or will use the data.

My question is, is there a need for this? -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
  - From: amyzing@talsever.com (Amelia A Lewis)

Prev by Date: (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread