[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> That's it. The next couple of paragraphs elaborate this, but do not add
> any further constraints. Since the URI reference is not part of the BNF
> grammar or a namespace constraint, it seems possible to claim
> conformance with non-URI values.
Elliote, I have to say I think you're straining at a gnat here.
Having isolated what you argue is a shortcoming in the spec, it would be
good form to advance a suggestion as to how it should be corrected.
Probably just make it clear that conformance to the RFC is required. -Tim
|
