[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Robin Berjon wrote:
> I'm not saying that such an API wouldn't be nice to have, but the
> statement you make is akin certainly does not match the expectations of
> the folks I've been working with who have long been waiting for NVDL
> implementations. What we need is tools to validate compound documents,
> nothing more. There's quite a bunch of folks out there who might be
> interested in validating the likes of XHTML+SVG.
Yes, exactly. The main motivation for creating JNVDL was need for
compound document aware validator for Relaxed XHTML validator
(http://www.relaxed.cz). Currently Relaxed uses manually created RELAX
NG schemas for validation of XHTML, XHTML+SVG, XHTML+MathML,
XHTML+SVG+MathML. But this approach doesn't scale very well if you want
to cover all possible combinations of XHTML + SVG, MathML, SMIL,
VoiceXML, RDF,... NVDL can simplify this task significantly.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nejbližší termíny školení:
** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 **
** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://xmlguru.cz Blog mostly about XML for English readers
------------------------------------------------------------------
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
|
