xml-dev

138 messages in this archive (listed by date, most recent first) | Thread Index

• Attention! Your PayPal account was limited!
  • From Service Paypal <service@paypal.com> on 31 Jan 2009 19:34:16 -0000
• Rules of Thumb for Creating XML Vocabularies for WorkflowApplications [Was: Keep business-process-specific data separate?]
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 31 Jan 2009 13:16:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] xml 1.0 document declaration question.
  • From Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> on 31 Jan 2009 11:48:13 -0000
• xml 1.0 document declaration question.
  • From Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@live.co.uk> on 31 Jan 2009 11:09:34 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 31 Jan 2009 01:42:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Jim Wilson" <jim.wilson@kcx.com> on 30 Jan 2009 21:20:55 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 30 Jan 2009 16:11:58 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> on 30 Jan 2009 15:24:06 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> on 30 Jan 2009 14:04:29 -0000
• RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 30 Jan 2009 13:32:59 -0000
• Re: Fw: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 30 Jan 2009 13:15:51 -0000
• Fw: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 30 Jan 2009 12:58:24 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good forstandardizing?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 30 Jan 2009 01:02:09 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au> on 30 Jan 2009 00:28:03 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Same element, different type
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 29 Jan 2009 23:18:02 -0000
• Re: [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au> on 29 Jan 2009 23:00:08 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Same element, different type
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 29 Jan 2009 19:58:51 -0000
• Same element, different type
  • From Keith Hassen <keith.hassen@gmail.com> on 29 Jan 2009 19:13:07 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev-list@boynings.co.uk> on 29 Jan 2009 16:45:44 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Jim Wilson" <jim.wilson@kcx.com> on 29 Jan 2009 16:42:00 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 29 Jan 2009 16:16:18 -0000
• [Summary] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Jan 2009 14:15:34 -0000
• [ANN] XML Prague final program announced
  • From Jim Fuller <jim.fuller@xmlprague.cz> on 29 Jan 2009 14:02:37 -0000
• RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 29 Jan 2009 13:07:04 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Len" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 29 Jan 2009 00:55:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev-list@boynings.co.uk> on 28 Jan 2009 23:51:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> on 28 Jan 2009 18:37:55 -0000
• RE: Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 28 Jan 2009 17:09:42 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Jim Wilson" <jim.wilson@kcx.com> on 28 Jan 2009 16:31:17 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 28 Jan 2009 16:20:22 -0000
• Keep business-process-specific data separate?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 28 Jan 2009 16:11:37 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefitsof namespace modularity
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 28 Jan 2009 14:29:30 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits of namespace modularity
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Jan 2009 14:11:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys thebenefits of namespace modularity
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 28 Jan 2009 14:09:01 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefitsof namespace modularity
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 28 Jan 2009 13:50:50 -0000
• XSD elementFormDefault="unqualified" destroys the benefits ofnamespace modularity
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 28 Jan 2009 13:34:22 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 28 Jan 2009 13:27:51 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 28 Jan 2009 13:04:40 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 27 Jan 2009 13:13:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 27 Jan 2009 13:06:20 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 27 Jan 2009 13:03:19 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 26 Jan 2009 13:54:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 26 Jan 2009 13:43:09 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 26 Jan 2009 13:35:18 -0000
• XSLT stylesheet looping through the same node (recursion?)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 26 Jan 2009 13:30:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 26 Jan 2009 13:25:59 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype
  • From richard@inf.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) on 25 Jan 2009 22:44:42 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 23 Jan 2009 20:58:46 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jan 2009 16:44:43 -0000
• Interesting (and useful) tidbits about the ID datatype
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 23 Jan 2009 16:11:35 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jan 2009 11:12:58 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jan 2009 10:16:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 23 Jan 2009 10:08:06 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jan 2009 10:00:17 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 23 Jan 2009 09:50:12 -0000
• [ANN] XMLmind XSL-FO Converter 4.3 released
  • From Olivier Ishacian <olivier@xmlmind.com> on 23 Jan 2009 09:34:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> on 23 Jan 2009 09:28:35 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 23 Jan 2009 09:01:38 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 23 Jan 2009 08:56:11 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From DavePawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> on 23 Jan 2009 07:59:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools
  • From Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com> on 23 Jan 2009 06:56:30 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From rjelliffe@allette.com.au on 23 Jan 2009 04:04:25 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 23 Jan 2009 01:04:43 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 23 Jan 2009 00:04:20 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "Len" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 22 Jan 2009 23:53:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From David Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com> on 22 Jan 2009 20:54:27 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 22 Jan 2009 20:51:41 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com> on 22 Jan 2009 18:25:54 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 22 Jan 2009 14:01:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 22 Jan 2009 13:31:49 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> on 22 Jan 2009 13:15:15 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 22 Jan 2009 13:08:18 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> on 22 Jan 2009 13:08:04 -0000
• XSLT Stylesheet Exclude Parental Search Results?
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 22 Jan 2009 13:01:21 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 22 Jan 2009 12:58:33 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 22 Jan 2009 12:56:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 22 Jan 2009 12:41:35 -0000
• Validate **against** a schema OR validate **with** a schema?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 22 Jan 2009 12:26:44 -0000
• Validate an instance document that has a replaceable datacomponent, specified by a taxonomy
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 21 Jan 2009 17:36:11 -0000
• [ANN] Axl Library 0.5.6 'Bohemian like you' release is ready!
  • From Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es> on 21 Jan 2009 11:21:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula
  • From Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org> on 21 Jan 2009 03:50:47 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet test for special character
  • From Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> on 21 Jan 2009 02:31:16 -0000
• XSLT Stylesheet test for special character
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 21 Jan 2009 02:04:07 -0000
• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBNZWFuaW5nIG9mICJEZXNpZ24gZm9yIHRoZSB1bmFudGljaXBhdGVkIHVzZXIi?=
  • From "CHET ENSIGN, BLOOMBERG/ B-LAW" <censign@bloomberg.net> on 20 Jan 2009 14:34:56 -0000
• B2MML schemas and definition of Equipment Classes
  • From Marcello Urgo <marcello.urgo@polimi.it> on 19 Jan 2009 22:01:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 19 Jan 2009 18:40:53 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From Fraser Goffin <goffinf@googlemail.com> on 19 Jan 2009 09:20:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@softml.net> on 19 Jan 2009 02:42:14 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Jan 2009 22:07:50 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Norbert Mikula
  • From "ken_north@compuserve.com" <ken_north@compuserve.com> on 17 Jan 2009 20:51:56 -0000
• RESTful, Secure, Non-SSL Authentication
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 17 Jan 2009 17:46:50 -0000
• Norbert Mikula
  • From "mc@xegesis.org" <mc@xegesis.org> on 17 Jan 2009 17:28:31 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 17 Jan 2009 17:13:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Jan 2009 16:36:47 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 17 Jan 2009 16:11:44 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> on 17 Jan 2009 15:45:19 -0000
• Meaning of "Design for the unanticipated user"
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 17 Jan 2009 13:42:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 15 Jan 2009 23:49:27 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 15 Jan 2009 23:41:59 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Serialization with SAX
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 15 Jan 2009 22:03:12 -0000
• Serialization with SAX
  • From Johannes Lichtenberger <Johannes.Lichtenberger@uni-konstanz.de> on 15 Jan 2009 21:29:47 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing?
  • From nico <ndebeiss@gmail.com> on 15 Jan 2009 12:51:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 15 Jan 2009 11:27:06 -0000
• Widget versioning - the widget, the spec, the platform api
  • From "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> on 15 Jan 2009 10:53:08 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents?
  • From "Liz Andrews" <liz.andrews@altova.com> on 14 Jan 2009 14:56:37 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents?
  • From George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> on 14 Jan 2009 14:04:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] A good XML editor for documents?
  • From "Laurens van den Oever" <laurens@xopus.com> on 14 Jan 2009 13:34:18 -0000
• A good XML editor for documents?
  • From Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf@omicron.se> on 14 Jan 2009 12:37:19 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good forstandardizing?
  • From "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV> on 14 Jan 2009 01:40:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie)
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 12 Jan 2009 23:06:03 -0000
• XSLT Stylesheet query (newbie)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 12 Jan 2009 22:53:29 -0000
• Announce: XML Prague 2009 CFP extended until Jan 16
  • From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 12 Jan 2009 22:40:32 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] What makes a data component good for standardizing?
  • From "Len" <cbullard@hiwaay.net> on 10 Jan 2009 16:48:33 -0000
• What makes a data component good for standardizing?
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 10 Jan 2009 14:34:17 -0000
• XML Schema Incompatibilities with Data Binding Tools
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 9 Jan 2009 19:51:56 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Validating Compound Documents using NVDL
  • From "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@gmail.com> on 9 Jan 2009 11:31:08 -0000
• Validating Compound Documents using NVDL
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 8 Jan 2009 20:02:35 -0000
• XML Technologies You Need For XML Workflow-Based Applications
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 7 Jan 2009 14:22:29 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validationinformation (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 7 Jan 2009 10:14:09 -0000
• Re: Metalink XML Download Description Format (draft-bryan-metalink-01)
  • From "Anthony Bryan" <anthonybryan@gmail.com> on 7 Jan 2009 02:26:45 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validationinformation (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com> on 6 Jan 2009 22:08:34 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embedvalidation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 6 Jan 2009 16:37:17 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embedvalidation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> on 6 Jan 2009 16:23:13 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie)
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:44:14 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:41:02 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validationinformation (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:28:22 -0000
• [Announce] XQilla 2.2.0 released
  • From John Snelson <john.snelson@oracle.com> on 6 Jan 2009 15:16:36 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerException (newbie)
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 6 Jan 2009 13:24:47 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] Here's why it's not always a good idea to embed validation information (e.g., schemaLocation) in instance documents
  • From "Cecil New" <cecil.new@gmail.com> on 6 Jan 2009 13:09:40 -0000
• Announce: XML Prague 2009 Last Call for Papers
  • From Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 6 Jan 2009 01:01:29 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 5 Jan 2009 11:19:23 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 5 Jan 2009 02:37:57 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 4 Jan 2009 15:13:40 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 4 Jan 2009 10:57:48 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Jan 2009 15:05:24 -0000
• Re: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com> on 2 Jan 2009 14:11:10 -0000
• RE: [xml-dev] JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com> on 2 Jan 2009 14:02:18 -0000
• JDOM XSLT TransformerConfigurationException
  • From Jack Bush <netbeansfan@yahoo.com.au> on 2 Jan 2009 13:53:47 -0000